An agreement in a case in a US state sets up new risks for all regulated businesses. Everywhere.
Until July 2020, it was difficult to do but easy to understand. Look for money that might arise from criminal conduct or might be on the way to finance terrorism and follow a course of action set down in law and regulation.
Now it's far, far more complicated.
The case is about private banking in New York, USA. The lessons in and the effect of the case is for every business regulated for financial crime (e.g. money laundering and terrorist financing) anywhere in the world.
The course includes a critical analysis of the Consent Order and additional background information. It also explains how and why the new risks arise and what those risks are.
This is a senior level course which means that it is designed for
- those working in law firms
- managers, compliance and risk officers and directors/ owners of businesses dealing with law firms.
It will prove valuable to many front line staff for whom lawyers are a part of their day-to-day activity.
Access - unrestricted for one year
Hours: Two
Examination: yes
Retakes: yes.
Certificate: yes
Certificate validity: 12 months.
Portable CPD (TM): where recognised 2 hours
Course language: English
Pre-requisites
1. Site registration
2. Quick To Learn More - About and Manual
Age limit: none
Payment method: credit or debit card
Payment Gateway: Stripe
Price: shown above includes UK VAT where applicable.
1.1 Caveat and Legal
1.2 Status of this Course
1.3 Pre-requisite
2.1 Overview 1
2.2 Overview 2
3.1 First, debunk myths and clarify something.
4.1 Epstein’s money – clean or not? 1
4.2 Epstein’s money – clean or not? 2
4.3 Criminal and other allegations against Epstein.
4.4 Epstein’s relationship with Deutsche Bank.
4.5 Embarrassment for the Wolfsberg Group
5.1 Money, money everywhere and lots of it to spend
5.2 Compromised account opening process
5.3 Financial Crime Risk and Compliance was subject to commercial interests
5.4 Never mind the quality, have more Champagne
5.5 Compliance takes action but it doesn’t work.
5.6. More warning signs 1
5.7 More warning signs 2
5.8 More warning signs 3
5.9 ″Suspicious cash activity″
5.10 Deutsche Bank’s exit strategy.
6.1 Was there a conflict of interest within the bank?
7.1 A significant change in interpretation of the Bank Secrecy Act.
8. 1 Is the Deutsche case a precedent? 1
8. 2 Is the Deutsche case a precedent? 2
8.3 Is the Deutsche case a precedent? 3
8.4 Is the Deutsche case a precedent? 4
8.5 Is the Deutsche case a precedent? 5
8.6 Does it matter whether it’s a precedent?
9.1 NY DFS makes its stance clear
10.1 About turn on long established approaches.
10.2 More risks.
11.1 The sweet treat after the bitter medicine.
Now for your examination
Examination: Deutsche Bank, NY DFS, Epstein, Financial Crime Risk and Compliance.